Hillary’s exaggerated claim that she “helped bring peace to Norther Ireland” is another example of her natural inclination for fabrication, half-truths and deception.

“And therein lies one of the most vulnerable aspects of her candidacy: the absence of even a shred of authenticity. Is there any aspect of Hillary’s march to the White House that will be, genuine, sincere, spontaneous and not heavily scripted? For many Democrats, the Selma incident simply reinforces the painful answer to this question — No. In light of the reality of an alternative in Obama, the inevitable dilemma for party loyalists becomes: how do they explain, enable or continue to justify the incorrigible mendacity of the Clintons’?

There was no need to adopt the fake Southern accent, just as there was no need to say I didn’t inhale, or that President Clinton’s troubles were all caused by a vast right-wing conspiracy; nor, that Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, despite the fact the mountaineer scaled Everest some six years after Hillary was born. As they watch the tactics from the old Clinton Administration play out endlessly through the vehicle of Hillary’s candidacy, many Democrats, who out of party loyalty, were forced to bear witness to the moral fiber of their party being corroded, must now, in exasperation, say never again. As David Geffen reminded us, the Clintons’ lie with ease; close observers of this political couple also remind us of another, perhaps even more painful truth: the Clintons’ lie unnecessarily. For them, deception is a virtue.”