In a refreshing turn of events, Bob Woodward has joined a growing chorus of those who aren’t buying what the Democrats are selling as the justification for their latest strategy for a precipitous defeat in Iraq couched in specious phraseology such as “redeployment, “we support the troops”, and it’s “Bush” War.”
On Sunday’s Chris Matthews Show, Woodward has this to say about the recent troop surge debate:
“One of the things that we forget as we’re caught in the heat of the current debate: this is a legal war. The Congress three to one in 2002 said, gave Bush the right to go to war. He decided to do it. So, you know what really amazes me is that Bush, and Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid don’t get together and say, “We’ve got to come up with a bipartisan strategy and consensus on this.” We’re all in to a certain extent in this war. And we owe it to the troops.”
The conversation continued:
Matthews: But what happens when you have a country that is so divided if you just poll regular people about this war, so much against this war, but yet the commander-in-chief is for the war. How do you reach a consensus between a majority who don’t want the war, and a president who wants one? How do you do it?
Woodward: I think that people have to rise above politics and party here. And, think, I’ve talked to these people who have come back from Iraq, and in communication with some there, and they wonder: “What the hell is going on in America? What? You know, we’re here, they sent us here. And we’re talking about cutting off funding.”
The disconnect between the Democrats’ words and deeds on this issue is now clearly visible, and no amount of spin can disguise that fact.