Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.
Otto von Bismarck
Despite my initial disappointment upon hearing of the compromise on the immigration bill, I am confident that the more this porker of a bill sees the light of day, the greater its chances of never reaching the House. The negotiations that led to the compromise are a perfect example of Bismarck’s above-quoted dictum writ large.
The Senate bill, as currently drafted, is analogous to a situation where a stranger breaks into my house, sits down at the supper table and when the uninvited guest is asked to leave after partaking of our repast, he gleefully exclaims, “What’s for dessert?”
Winners and losers
McCain is the big loser here. A question arises: what in God’s name was he thinking? As someone who is seeking the nomination of his party, did he expect that the conservative base of his party would embrace this monstrosity, which in effect, turns the United States into a province of Mexico?
In short, whether he knows it or not, McCain’s presidential aspirations are over.
Romney is the big winner here. He has been handed a massive rubber mallet with which to bludgeon McCain and Romney will use it deftly and effectively. Romney is already surging ahead of McCain in the most recent Iowa polls.
Guiliani is also a loser here. He is a one-issue candidate, and his position on illegal immigration, in many ways, is substantially similar to that of McCain. If Romney forces Guiliani to articulate where he stands on illegal immigration, any exchange is likely to redound to the benefit of Romney.
The Social Security System can’t even cope with the enormous cost of dispensing benefits to the massive number of baby boomers who will be retiring shortly but the authors of the Senate bill deemed it prudent nonetheless to add this additional and onerous burden. And why? Because we need to bring these people out from the shadows?
Forgive me if I find this philosophical justification less than compelling.